Skip to main content

AN ECONOMY ITSELF


There is no such thing as 'the economy' or 'an economy' except as a geographically defined ecosystem. And this is largely arbitrary, a product of political history; diplomacy, warfare, court intrigue & the odd peasant revolt here and there.

Animals have the food chain. Consenting humans have a meta-layer on top of this called the division of labour, which arises through people seeking their comparative advantage, rather than the predation we see by a lion upon a gazelle.

The division of labour is built on top of several exchanges which end with a consumption good or service like a chair, a laptop, a haircut or a showing of a movie at a cinema that some consumer purchases.

It serves the purposes of folks in the halls of power to tot up aggregated figures or the performance of this beast called the economy. Going into an election you want to be able to say "the pie grew faster with me in charge than it would have done, or will, with my opponent running things" because if people believe you they'll vote for you.

Of course promises aren't only about economic growth, but about this inequality shtick that has become fetishised over the last couple of decades. Inequality can also be measured in aggregate form and so makes an easy political football for politicians to kick in each other's faces for our enjoyment.

But what kind of existence does a national economy really exhibit? No offence, but not much. The majority of physical stuff purchased in British stores, for example, was manufactured outside of the borders of the United Kingdom. The division of labour - absent regulations to the contrary - doesn't stick neatly to national boundaries.

Also, economic activity consists of individual acts of gift and trade, with the latter functioning for all intents and purposes like mutual gift-giving. That mutual aspect of trade is probably the reason both parties to a trade say thank you.

The more of these trades are involved in the process of going from highest-order, originary factors of production down to the lowest order consumer goods and services, the more precisely and responsively those goods and services will be priced, and the more they will fall over time. Falling real prices lead to falling real poverty.

Talking about 'the economy' is all well and good but remember it's just an abstraction built by aggregating the distinct, separate economic activities of thousands and thousands of smaller divisions of labour, themselves comprised of thousands of individual trades between actually existing persons!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Iain McKay, Bryan Caplan & the Case of the "Anarchist" Anarchist

In the past I have written blog posts disputing claims contained in the online document called An Anarchist FAQ principally written by Iain McKay. I spent those posts trying to contend with Iain's claims re  the ancap question  and  the mode of production called capitalism . McKay has a bee in his bonnet re anarcho-capitalists' insistence on referring to themselves as anarchists, that much is obvious. Every reference to ancapism runs something along the lines of "an"cap or "anarcho"-capitalism. I find this very amusing because 'anarchist' or 'anarchism' are words (articulate mouth-sounds) first and specific concepts second.  Ditto 'socialist' and 'socialism' friends. Speaking of socialism... In  the comment section of one of his videos  the Youtuber called StatelessLiberty responded to a criticism by linking to Caplan's work  on the Anarchist adventure in Spain in the 1930's . The critic shot back with a  critic

The 'neoliberal optimism industry' industry

A podcast, Citations Needed , forgot that poverty, violence, hunger and infant mortality are declining and decided that all of the media folk saying positive things about the major trend of our time (modern economic growth) are all wrong. The neoliberal optimism industry is hard at work pushing a cherry-picked slab of bias in our faces and we fellow optimists are all being bamboozled. Of course this is completely wrong, per abundant scholarship and evidence, some even tweeted by Pinker himself on November 24th 2018, four days before this podcast was released. At 05:00 into the podcast they seem to suggest that liberal capitalism = alt-right and fascism! You might wonder why I bother mentioning this since they say they don't take the fish hook theory very seriously themselves. It's because they insist on reading things Pinker isn't saying into Pinker's public statements, so I will work from the assumption that I am supposed to read things these podcasters aren'

Doomer Eternal?

Youtuber Sarah Z talks about the Doomers, those who despair of the world. I am not trying to criticize Sarah Z's take since it is remarkably similar to mine, but I will dump my thoughts below anyway. [ 1 ] ~ ~ ~ The media has broadcast nothing but wall-to-wall doom-and-gloom for a-hundred years and then some. If things feel more hopeless now it's because so much of that media is social media generated by us, so that we are sharing the doom-and-gloom meme with each other AS WELL AS getting it from the mainstream media. Human life is in less peril than ever before (barring the possibility of WW3 between China & Russia v. NATO & SEATO) as economic development makes comfortable civilized living more and more accessible to more and more people every year, and the carbon intensity of every unit of GDP is continually declining. CO2 emissions could plausibly lead to specific calamities with identifiable bodycounts in the near future, and preventing CO2 emissions by the one plau